Radical transparency in pharmacy benefits management  starts with training and education. Click here to begin yours.

Ohio’s Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) charged the state a “spread” of more than 31 percent for generic drugs – nearly four times as much as the previously reported average spread across all drugs, according to a new report by Ohio Auditor of State Dave Yost.

An analysis conducted by Auditor Yost’s staff found PBMs collected $208 million in fees on generic Medicaid prescriptions, or 31.4 percent of the $662.7 million paid by managed care plans on generics during the one-year period April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018.

The Auditor’s review, conducted at the request of state lawmakers, largely confirmed the findings of a private consultant hired by the Ohio Department of Medicaid to examine the state’s system of managing its pharmacy plan. Specifically, lawmakers wanted to know how much PBMs are paid through the “spread” – which is the difference between what the state’s managed care plans pay the PBMs and what the PBMs pay pharmacies to dispense drugs.

Tyrone’s Commentary:

On the heels of terminating two large PBM contracts, the State Auditor of Ohio released this bombshell report detailing the financials which prompted terminating said contracts. Why do you think Chase Bank, Amazon and Berkshire Hathaway have taken matters into their own hands? Self-insured employers must first make sure all vendors and advisers interests are perfectly aligned to theirs. Second, get self-educated AND (not or) hire an expert with a proven track record whose interests too are perfectly aligned. I can assure you these qualifications makes the list of qualified candidates much smaller than you think. The bottom line – trailing public entities in how you manage pharmacy benefits is no longer sustainable.

“The more we learn, the more troubling this becomes,” Yost said. “Our review has answered many of the questions presented by state lawmakers, but the lack of information from the PBMs limits the depth of our work. Without more information – on what’s happened in the past and what is planned for the future – Ohioans will never know if they’re getting a fair price. They deserve an accurate accounting of this work.”

[Read More]

Source: Berkley Research Group and IMS Quintiles

Pfizer Inc. CEO Ian Read said on Tuesday July 31, 2018, “drugmakers will likely get rid of secret discounts to middlemen that have become a focus of the U.S. drug-cost debate.” What are these secret discounts and who are these middlemen to whom Ian Read is referring?

Rebates are secret discounts drugmakers use to compete for coveted spots on pharmacy benefit managers’ formularies or lists of covered drugs. The intent of these discounts is to help lower overall drug costs for third-party payers and patients.

Middlemen who negotiate drug rebates on behalf of employers and health plans but hide rebate revenue are called non-fiduciary pharmacy benefit managers or NFPBMs. Whether or not rebates, as a hidden cash flow, completely go away or how long it will take for drugmakers to get rid of them is unclear.

Let’s not be naive. If rebates go away do you believe for one second CVS Health’s or Optum’s PBM revenues will decline? Not a chance as they will shift your costs elsewhere. Here’s a look at some of the ways non-fiduciary PBMs will grow revenue despite the elimination of rebates.

Here is what some participants have said about the webinar.

A snapshot of what you will learn during this 30 minute webinar:

• Hidden cash flows in the PBM Industry such as formulary steering, rebate masking and differential pricing 
• How to calculate cost of pharmacy benefit manager services or CPBMS
• Specialty pharmacy cost-containment strategies
• The financial impact of actual acquisition cost (AAC) vs. maximum allowable cost (MAC)
• Why mail-order and preferred pharmacy networks may not be the great deal you were sold

List of Biosimilar Drugs and their Marketing Status (Updated September 14, 2017)

In 2017, biosimilars generated $3 billion worldwide in revenue and present growing market competition to the specialty biotech market. Escalating specialty drug costs present a challenge for many employers who struggle to balance health care spend with business financial livelihood.

Based on 2017 FDA research, the delayed market launch of nine biosimilars represented $4.5 billion in potential savings. As part of the FDA Biosimilar Action Plan, biosimilar drugs are poised to offer a solution that could help deliver significant cost advantages without compromising therapeutic efficacy, safety, or quality.

Biosimilars are biologic drugs that are highly similar in structure and function to existing FDA approved reference drugs. With fully established FDA safety and efficacy data, reference drugs are used as the benchmark to which biosimilars are compared to.

For example, Neupogen is the reference drug for both biosimilar products Zarxio and Granix. Biosimilars must demonstrate no clinically meaningful efficacy differences and equal safety to gain FDA approval. Biosimilars should not be viewed as generic drugs, but rather an alternative form of brand medications that would usually be categorized as specialty.

An increasingly popular culprit in the debate over high drug prices is the pharmaceutical rebate, the after-the-fact discounts that form the heart of the nation’s arcane — many would say broken — market for prescription drugs.

Tyrone’s Commentary:

My thoughts on rebates are well-documented throughout this blog. Do a quick search to read any number of related posts. The bottom line is plan sponsors are entitled to every penny a manufacturer pays to a PBM for a drug put on its formulary and for some drugs dispensed on the medical side. Most plan sponsors believe they are getting 90% or more of the rebates back but in many cases the actual number is far less. 

Now, a growing chorus wants to get rid of them, or at least change the way they are applied after drug companies have already set their prices. Rebates, critics say, have pushed up the list price of brand-name drugs, which consumers are increasingly responsible for paying. Insurers generally get to keep the rebates without passing them along to their members.

Last week, the drug industry’s largest trade group, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, took aim at the rebate system, proposing a change to the way middlemen handle rebates, and how those companies are paid.

[Read More]

Some proposals for saving on drug and medical costs include: conducting clinical reviews of drug formularies; eliminating unnecessary or low-value medical procedures; and offering account-based health plans (ABHPs) with health savings accounts (HSAs), strategies attributed to “high-performing” organizations, according to a Willis Towers Watson study released in March.

The industry has seen a number of big moves, company-wise, in the pharmaceutical space in recent months, including CVS’s deal to buy Aetna — a move that experts say could force employers to rethink common assumptions about how they purchase prescription drug benefits. Amazon, also, recently made headlines for its purchase of PillPack, an online pharmacy offering home delivery.

[Read More]